For someone who is into scary stuff, I have a few fears.  Most of them, of course, completely irrational.  Clowns, dolls, creepy kids (why am I a school teacher again???).  Something that really scares the living *beeps* out of me is space.  Yes, as in the starry, other-worldly unknown that our lovely planet floats in.  It’s not even aliens or anything that instills this sense of fear in me; it is merely the thought of going up there.  I am so terrified of the day where man is able to travel to space for recreation – this is something I will not allow anyone to convince me to do.  Yep, I know.  I’m weird.

So, given my irrational and overwhelming fear of space, I find space movies quite creepy.  Perhaps this is why I am not a great fan of sci-fi.  I know it is called ‘fiction’ for a reason, but I don’t know… I’ll take a serial killer down on Earth anytime for mental madness up high beyond our atmosphere.  It is because of this that I actually am wondering why I bought 1997’s ‘Event Horizon’ from Big W for a measly $6.  I had heard it was pretty good, and if you know me well, you know I have this crazy ambition to own every horror-esque movie ever made.  We all know I can be overly ambitious…

Last night I felt in the mood for an action flick.  Unfortunately, with heavy eyelids at 9.30pm, most of the ones we own surpass the 120 minute mark.  I pulled out ‘Event Horizon’, knowing fair well that Dave was feeling tired and lazy and wouldn’t argue if I put the disc in the player before he knew what we were about to watch.  I have to say though, I should’ve done my homework because what we were about to watch was not the action movie I was hoping for; turns out, it was a twisted, psychological movie based in space.

The movie basically runs as a haunted house movie, set inside a dark and somewhat gothic spacecraft.  To give you a bit of background information, it is the year 2040 and the Event Horizon is a starship that was designed to travel faster than the speed of light through the universe by creating folds in space.  It sounds more complex than it actually is – IMDB for a more scientific explanation of this.  The ship has disappeared without a trace for seven years, beyond Neptune – until it has suddenly reappeared in 2047.    Sam Neill stars as Dr. William Weir, the designer of the monstrosity that is the Event Horizon starship.  He has recently suffered a loss as his wife committed suicide and throughout the film he is haunted by this event.  Weir is called to assist a rescue team led by Captain Miller (Laurence Fishburne) to investigate the ship and hopefully rescue the crew that has been missing along with the ship for the past seven years.  They arrive at the Event Horizon where Weir explains that the ship had been on its initial test flight when it vanished.  He plays Captain Miller’s crew the only signal received since the ship’s reappearance – naturally, the crew is speaking in Latin.  D.J. (played by Jason Isaacs) translates this to ‘save me’.  As the crew further investigates the ship, there is no trace of human life found, except for a frozen, floating corpse with no eyes.  One of the crew discovers the core of the ship, the gravity drive, which is what creates the temporary black hole for the ship to travel through.  The drive is activated and from here on the strange occurences begin. 

As usual, I won’t give too much else away, because there is nothing worse than a promising movie being spoiled.  The movie is incredibly interesting because it ends up using elements of the supernatural instead of stereotypical aliens to describe the horror that the crew’s ship encounters.  By about the halfway mark you really get sucked into this movie; if possible, watch it with the lights off to get the full impact of the film.  You’ll need this when they actually translate the blurred video of the missing crew losing their minds – it’s pretty hardcore.  Paul W.S. Anderson, fresh from the success of ‘Mortal Kombat’, turned down X-Men to create his take on this atmospheric horror film.  Apparently he cut thirty minutes of gory footage to allow for the film’s R-rating in America (equivalent of our MA15+).  The sicko in me really would have liked to have seen the other footage – I’ll have to see what the DVD’s special features offer me.

Give this film a go – for the price of a rental, you could buy it and keep it.  It was a surprisingly addictive and enjoyable ride that made my mind a little crazy.  Given its’ time, the effects were pretty good too (take that, special effects people who rely on 3D!!!).  Some of the supporting crew are mediocre, but I love Jason Isaacs (for more reasons than one) and pre-Morpheus Fishburne proves that he can be vulnerable at times.  Sam Neill is… well, Sam Neill.  Dave mentioned that he is only known for chasing dinosaurs, but I don’t know… this film may have changed his opinion.  And as for the overall feel of the movie, Anderson is reported to have taken influence from 'The Shining' and 'Hellraiser', two movies I have indeed seen and completely can understand what elements of these he has used.

Enjoy the movie and let me know what you think!

So hopefully you’re reading this entry after you read my review on the classic 1985 vampire flick, Fright Night.  If you are not living under a rock, I’m sure by now you’ve seen the trailers for the ‘new’ Fright Night starring Colin Farrell. 

I previously mentioned that this was a modern reimagining; and that it is.  I was very pleased to notice that while the main gist of the plot and the characters were the same, the movie wasn’t shot as a frame-by-frame replica of the original.  Yay – brownie points!

Colin Farrell plays Jerry, who moves into the house next door to Charlie Brewster (Anton Yelchin, who you may have seen previously as Chekov in the new Star Trek).  Charlie is a lot different in this version, as he has a beautiful girlfriend and is shedding his nerdy image in hopes to be recognised as someone ‘cool’ by the stereotypical jocks.  Charlie’s childhood best friend, Ed, is suspicious of their other friend Adam’s disappearance and attempts to convince Charlie that Jerry is a vampire – something Charlie doesn’t want to believe.  But as different events occur and Charlie starts observing, he realises the impossible and goes out to kill Jerry once and for all.

I don’t want to give too much away as I know this is a movie a lot of people have seen or will go and see.  I guess we have a certain sparkly wussy boy to thank for this generation’s love of fangs.  I really enjoyed the movie, as did my Dad.  It was entertaining and a bit of junk food; Christopher Mintz-Plasse as Ed is a classic and if you see the movie, you’ll know what I mean.  Special mention goes to David Tennant, whose Criss Angel-esque representation of Peter Vincent is a cracker.  I couldn’t get over the fact that he was supposed to look like a hardcore guy, leather-bound and tattooed and draped in naked girls… yet his drink of choice was Midori.  Yep.

So check it out, if you can afford the $18 then go see it in a cinema (not 3D though – 3D is the antichrist)… otherwise wait until DVD, but either way it’s an enjoyable ride and a bit of fun that quite frankly, not too many flicks these days give us.  

When we hear the term ‘horror movie’, so many of our minds are bombarded with the slew of remakes from past horror masterpieces.  These remakes, however, are quite often sub-par (or worse).  I know I am constantly referring to classics and remakes (and admitting, on occasion, that a remake can succeed the original – BUT THIS IS RARE!!!) but unfortunately at the moment this is almost the definition of a cinema-released scary flick.  It seemed only relevant with its modern reimagining coming out that I write about Tom Holland’s 1985 vamp comedy/horror ‘Fright Night’. 

This is another one that I have to thank my dad for… take that, Twihards who are going to go and see Colin Farrell try to be a sexy vampire with the name ‘Jerry’.  Sorry guys, as much as I like Colin Farrell, there is no replacement for Chris Sarandon as Jerry.  Anyway, I’m once again getting off track…

The film is centered on Charlie Brewster (William Ragsdale) who is certain that a vampire has moved into the house next door and is killing off people close to him.  Of course, nobody believes him, so he sets out to find the one person who will believe him – late night TV host of horror show ‘Fright Night’, Peter Vincent (Roddy McDowall).  However, much to Charlie’s dismay, Peter Vincent’s show is based on fiction rather than fact, and it takes a lot of convincing (and some cash incentives) to gain his knowledge and help to defeat Jerry. 

Obviously this is about all of the premise I’m going to give you as I don’t want to give away any of the defining moments in the plot (and also because I know some of you will choose to see the remake over the original, and I am unsure how true to the original it will be).  I really enjoyed this movie the first time I watched it (as a teenager??) and continue to enjoy it every time since.  I think because it has that perfect blend of scary moment and laughs, and of course, cheesy 80s vampires (gotta love it).  Roddy McDowall is awesome (his facial expressions are gold); I’m really interested to see how his role is portrayed in the 2011 version.  David Tennant of Doctor Who fame is playing Vincent, albeit in such a fashion that is a cross between Tommy Lee and Criss Angel.  I love this movie and will be going to see the new version as soon as it is released (hopefully with not too high of hopes)… I have faith in it knowing that Marti Noxon is involved; she was heavily involved in my all time favourite TV show, Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Watch the original before the 2011 version, if you can help it, and I will blog the latter as soon as I have seen it.  In the meantime, give the 1985 version a fair go – it is definitely worthwhile.  Enjoy!

Thinking back to where it all began, I guess I have my dad to thank for my love of horror films.  He has always gotten me sucked into anything that could possibly give me the heeby-jeebies.  Now that I think of it, ‘sucked in’ is the predominant term used here – combine Dad’s love of vampire films as well as the suckiest of sucky Z-grade horror films, and you know exactly what I mean.

With consideration to the episodes of ‘Are You Afraid Of The Dark?’ we used to watch when I was not even in double digits, as well as the lure of ‘The Lost Boys’ (one of my personal faves, cheers for that Dad!), I know that I have to trust his judgement. Don’t get me wrong though, this man has forced me to watch some absolute shockers from time to time (and, I suppose, vice versa…).  I knew though that I had to give him the benefit of the doubt and give John Carpenter’s 1978 ‘Halloween’ a stab (literally, bahh!).

As a child of the late eighties, it is really hard not to get drawn into all of the graphically amazing remakes of the films my dad relates to his teens.  I think he secretly hates that I like them – and in a way, I do too.  I feel like I am being disrespectful when I liked the remake of ‘The Omen’ better than the original.  But when Dad watched Rob Zombie’s ‘Halloween’ and enjoyed it, it only made sense for me to catch up with the original and see what I thought.  And to be honest, I was pleasantly surprised!  It isn’t everyday I get that tingling in my spine, that feeling where you stare into the television, looking for the reflection of some serial killer standing right behind you. 

‘Halloween’ totally did this for me.  Michael Myers is – wow, he’s iconic.  Everybody knows who Michael Myers is, and even if they don’t, they can associate his ghostly mask with the movie that made him.  The storyline was fairly interesting; psycho kid kills his sister, gets locked up in asylum until he’s an adult, escapes and goes on a killing spree in his native town of Haddonfield.  I especially love that his prey is Jamie Lee Curtis’ Laurie Strode, someone who we have absolutely no freaking idea why he is going after her (see Halloween II for further info).  Myers stalks her throughout the entire day of October 31^st, following her and watching her and waiting for his moment to strike.  After knocking off a few of Laurie’s friends, Myers’ time to shine is while she is babysitting a couple of local kidlets.  It is moments like these that give me that uneasy feeling – they usually never kill the kids in the movies, but in this moment can you really be sure? 

I won’t give away the ending because I think this movie is truly worth a look; I will be picking it up at JB Hi-Fi in the near future (think it retails for about $14 on DVD).  But I am deliriously happy that I finally felt a surge of discomfort throughout this movie, something that so many ‘horror’ movies lack thesedays.  There was one moment especially where I got goosebumps and that urge to shout “Look behind you!” like a moron at the television.  You can see it in the above picture.  It’s one of those truly magnificent moments in cinema where if you blink you will probably miss it, but for some reason I found my eyes glued on the screen. 

I think John Carpenter did a tremendous job at this film, something that was surely revolutionary for the horror world.  I mean, let’s face it, would ‘Scream’ and Ghostface actually have existed should it have not been for Michael Myers?  If you haven’t seen this movie, definitely give it a shot.  It’s obviously not as slick and blood-drenched as post-1995 horror, but you will surely find that sense of satisfaction you’ve been longing for.  Enjoy!

For those of you that don’t know me well, I live for movies.  Not just any movies; horror movies.  They are my absolute favourites.

I love nothing more than to chill out with a choice snack and flick on a film that I hope will send shivers down my spine, tingles to my toes and gurgles in my gut.  Generally, I feel none of these things, just disappointment and a sense of disbelief – can they actually come up with a decent concept?

I’ve laughed my way through many modern horror movies, although ‘horror’ isn’t really a good definition of the genre.  More like ‘poxy teenybopper gore-porn’.  Don’t get me wrong, I’ve shuddered through ‘Saw’ and hidden my eyes from ‘Hostel’, but those movies rely on bloody torture and shock factor.  The only reason they cause me grief is from the thought of having those disgusting, inexplicable things done to me.  Not out of scare factor.

So when I feel like a good scare, which is often follow by a hearty laugh at myself, I turn to classics.  Very few modern films have the same thrills and chills as an old-school horror movie, and so it is obvious I have to turn to films that were made even before I was born.

Today I revisited a movie that I would deem one of my all-time favourite; it is original, scary, funny and sadistic.  It checks all the right boxes and cements itself as not only one of my classics, but one of the horror world’s ultimates.  It is 1981’s ‘The Evil Dead’.

If you have never seen this movie then you now have a mission.  It is beyond cool and is just downright awesome.  Sam Raimi wrote and directed this one, as well as its sequel ‘Evil Dead 2’ and the last in the trilogy, ‘Army of Darkness’.  That one is a whole different ball game, but let’s not get off track.

‘The Evil Dead’ follows the traditional formula; a bunch of American teenagers venture out to an isolated cabin in the woods, strange things start happening and one by one, each character is picked off.  I will have to do a bit of investigating to see if this was where the clichéd formula began, and it is quite possible that this was one of the very few movies where the formula worked.  The thing about ‘The Evil Dead’ is that there are no axe-wielding psychos, no chainsaw-revving in the background.  It relies on the concept of ‘The Book of the Dead’; a book that exists in the cabin that causes all sorts of fun and games as the film progresses. 

‘The Evil Dead’ was Bruce Campbell’s breakout role, and for those of you that don’t know who he is, he is God.  No, obviously he’s not, but you need to Google him.  I cannot explain to you how amazing he is; he is a cult hero.  I’m sure most of you are familiar with Sam Raimi’s work on ‘Spiderman’, which was very good, yes. But there is nothing more satisfying than the claymation-type exploding bodies that you will witness in ‘The Evil Dead’.  If you are in need of something a little more recent to get your Raimi horror fix, try ‘Drag Me To Hell’.  Another of my self-declared classics.

I very much recommend ‘The Evil Dead’.  You will either love it or hate it; either way you will laugh, jump, roll your eyes and wrinkle your nose.  It is a brilliant horror movie that sets the benchmark for every other horror movie you will ever watch.

Greetings fellow crazy people!


You've officially clicked onto my new blog, 'How Horrorble!'


As the name suggests, I'll be keeping you up to speed on all things horror - reviews on killer flicks (new and old), opinions, general news and freaky facts.


Feel free to sign up to have each entry emailed to you automatically, and if you know anyone who is as twisted as the rest of them, have them follow too!


Enjoy and can't wait for the feedback!


-- NJ.